Oral Answers to Questions

Debate between Shailesh Vara and Tulip Siddiq

Tuesday 8th December 2015 Commons Chamber

[Mr Vara]

The hon. Gentleman needs to appreciate that we have had to take tough measures. It is vital, and the British people in their millions rightfully say that they want overseas people to have some connection with the UK before getting use of the taxes that they pay. The residence test has gone through the court process to the Court of Appeal, and if it goes further, the Government will object and robustly defend our stance on the residence test.

[Tulip Siddiq (Hampstead and Kilburn) (Lab)]

5. If he will make an assessment of the effect of the criminal courts charge on access to justice; and if he will make a statement.

Court Charges (Access to Justice)

Debate between Shailesh Vara and Tulip Siddiq

Tuesday 17th November 2015 Westminster Hall

[Mr Vara]

The legal aid fund is one of the most generous in the world, after the reductions, at some £1.6 billion. It was previously over £2 billion. We have made reductions and we still rank among the top countries in legal aid provision. It is important to remember that point, which also addresses some of the comments of the hon. Member for Hampstead and Kilburn about access to justice. Let me remind her that, notwithstanding the reductions made by the Government in the past five years, we remain one of the most generous countries in the world for legal aid payments.

There is a high level of consensus across the justice system that the current system is unsustainable. This means that the court system must undergo fundamental reform. Our justice system must work better to deliver swifter, fairer and more efficient access to justice for everyone.

[Tulip Siddiq]

Will the Minister give way?

[Mr Vara]

I will give way, but I will not be able to conclude my comments. Only one and a half minutes remain.

[Tulip Siddiq]

I would like to know whether the review will be brought forward or whether it will take three years.

[Mr Vara]

As my right hon. Friend the Lord Chancellor has said, the matter is under review.

Our justice system must work better to deliver swifter, fairer and more efficient access to justice for everyone. It must uphold the rule of law, the most precious asset of any civilised society. Changes to fees have occurred on the civil side, and bearing the burden of running the criminal courts cannot continue to be purely the responsibility of the taxpayer. Offenders must take responsibility for their actions, and the criminal courts charge is an important part of this. In reforming the courts and bearing down on the costs of running them, the Government are determined to make the justice system more efficient and to transform it into a modern public service.

I want to make it clear to the hon. Lady and to all other hon. Members present that I am aware of the concerns and various issues that have been raised, and I will certainly take on board all that has been said by her and other hon. Members. However, it is important to stress—I hope the hon. Lady will appreciate this—that in reviewing the charge, we must consider all the evidence to allow us to form an appropriate view and to help us to make sure that the criminal courts are run efficiently and fairly. I congratulate the hon. Lady again on securing this important debate.

Question put and agreed to.

Resolved,

That this House has considered court charges and access to justice.

Oral Answers to Questions

Debate between Shailesh Vara and Tulip Siddiq

Tuesday 3rd November 2015 Commons Chamber

[Mr Vara]

I announced the consultation on 16 July and it has now closed. If the hon. Lady wishes to provide me with further information, I assure her that it will still be taken into account.

[Tulip Siddiq (Hampstead and Kilburn) (Lab)]

11. What plans he has to review the level of the criminal courts charge.