To match an exact phrase, use quotation marks around the search term. eg. "Parliamentary Estate". Use "OR" or "AND" as link words to form more complex queries.


Keep yourself up-to-date with the latest developments by exploring our subscription options to receive notifications direct to your inbox

Division Vote (Commons)
2 Jun 2026 - Armed Forces Bill - View Vote Context
Sam Rushworth (Lab) voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 297 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 170 Noes - 301
Speech in Commons Chamber - Mon 01 Jun 2026
Lord Mandelson Humble Address: Government Response

"Peter Mandelson should never have been appointed, and I look forward to the day that we can remove him as a peer. Even now, he makes a mockery of this process by not releasing his messages. Is there anything that the Government can do to compel Peter Mandelson to provide …..."
Sam Rushworth - View Speech

View all Sam Rushworth (Lab - Bishop Auckland) contributions to the debate on: Lord Mandelson Humble Address: Government Response

Written Question
Countryside Stewardship Scheme
Wednesday 27th May 2026

Asked by: Sam Rushworth (Labour - Bishop Auckland)

Question to the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs:

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, what the average waiting time is for applicants between between being invited to apply online by the Rural Payments Agency to secure a Countryside Stewardship Higher Tier agreement and securing a signed agreement.

Answered by Angela Eagle - Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs

The scheme is in an early stage “private beta” rollout where delivery times would be expected to be longer than normal. So far, the average time from invitation to apply to the Rural Payments Agency offering an agreement to the customer is around 90 daysfor what are 10-year agreements.

The length of time taken to reach agreement includes customer action and can vary considerably depending on a number of factors, including the complexity, specialist advice, site assessment, and time taken to agree management options.


Written Question
Countryside Stewardship Scheme
Wednesday 27th May 2026

Asked by: Sam Rushworth (Labour - Bishop Auckland)

Question to the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs:

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, how many Countryside Stewardship Higher Tier agreements have been accepted since September 2025; and how many farmers have been invited to apply for Countryside Stewardship Higher Tier since September 2025.

Answered by Angela Eagle - Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs

Since September 2025, the Rural Payments Agency (RPA) has invited 903 farmers to apply for a Countryside Stewardship Higher Tier (CSHT) agreement. Over the same period the number of CSHT agreements that have been accepted is 431.

The RPA continues to streamline the application process and ensure that agreements are progressed as efficiently as possible.


Written Question
Countryside Stewardship Scheme
Wednesday 27th May 2026

Asked by: Sam Rushworth (Labour - Bishop Auckland)

Question to the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs:

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, whether everyone with a legacy Countryside Stewardship Higher Tier agreement that expired on 30 December 2025 secured a new Countryside Stewardship Higher Tier agreement.

Answered by Angela Eagle - Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs

The new Countryside Stewardship Higher Tier (CSHT) service opened for applications in September 2025 for groups who had been invited to apply. This included farmers land managers with existing Higher Tier agreements due to expire in December 2025.

Not all agreement holders will have secured a new Higher Tier agreement: This is reflected by a number of factors including if the applicant has engaged in the application process taking into account their individual requirements, whether a suitable new agreement proposal can be offered and the impact of site-specific environmental requirements and assessments.


Division Vote (Commons)
21 May 2026 - Steel Industry (Nationalisation) Bill - View Vote Context
Sam Rushworth (Lab) voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 231 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 68 Noes - 242
Division Vote (Commons)
20 May 2026 - Defence Readiness - View Vote Context
Sam Rushworth (Lab) voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 304 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 104 Noes - 317
Division Vote (Commons)
20 May 2026 - Defence Readiness - View Vote Context
Sam Rushworth (Lab) voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 300 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 307 Noes - 171
Division Vote (Commons)
20 May 2026 - Defence Readiness - View Vote Context
Sam Rushworth (Lab) voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 302 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 104 Noes - 316
Division Vote (Commons)
20 May 2026 - Defence Readiness - View Vote Context
Sam Rushworth (Lab) voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 301 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 78 Noes - 408