Debates between Ruth Jones and Tom Pursglove during the 2019-2024 Parliament

Oral Answers to Questions

Debate between Ruth Jones and Tom Pursglove
Monday 31st October 2022

(2 years, 1 month ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Tom Pursglove Portrait The Minister of State, Department for Work and Pensions (Tom Pursglove)
- View Speech - Hansard - - - Excerpts

I strongly agree. Programmes such as the Access to Work scheme have supported the Government in meeting five years early their commitment to see a million more disabled people in work in the decade to 2027. We want to create more of those opportunities—in which spirit, I commend Florence for her determination. As a Government, we are determined to help her to succeed.

Ruth Jones Portrait Ruth Jones (Newport West) (Lab)
- View Speech - Hansard - -

T3. Since I came to this place in 2019, I have worked with and fought the corner of all the women in Newport West who face discrimination due to their gender and age. Those WASPI women—Women Against State Pension Inequality—have shown incredible perseverance and tenacity over the years. Will the Minister set out the steps that are being taken to address this issue? If she cannot meet the women because of the ongoing investigation, will she meet me to discuss this important issue at the earliest opportunity?

Oral Answers to Questions

Debate between Ruth Jones and Tom Pursglove
Tuesday 22nd March 2022

(2 years, 9 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Tom Pursglove Portrait Tom Pursglove
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I am grateful to my hon. Friend for raising that difficult and tragic constituency case. I would be grateful if he took the opportunity to meet me to discuss it in more detail, so that I can understand the circumstances and provide a full response.

Ruth Jones Portrait Ruth Jones (Newport West) (Lab)
- Hansard - -

Last week, I received an email from the Gwent Citizen Panel about the consultation on the Government proposals to scrap the Human Rights Act 1998. The Government produced a consultation on 14 December but did not produce an easy-read version, nor any other versions, such as one in British Sign Language, an audio version or one in Makaton. Why was that?