To match an exact phrase, use quotation marks around the search term. eg. "Parliamentary Estate". Use "OR" or "AND" as link words to form more complex queries.


Keep yourself up-to-date with the latest developments by exploring our subscription options to receive notifications direct to your inbox

Division Vote (Commons)
12 Mar 2024 - Budget Resolutions - View Vote Context
Royston Smith (Con) voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 311 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 318 Noes - 43
Written Question
Building Regulations
Wednesday 6th March 2024

Asked by: Royston Smith (Conservative - Southampton, Itchen)

Question to the Department for Levelling Up, Housing & Communities:

To ask the Secretary of State for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities, what assessment he has made of the adequacy of time taken for the Building Safety Regulator to process building assessment certificate applications; and what steps his Department is taking to improve those times.

Answered by Lee Rowley - Minister of State (Minister for Housing)

As yet, no building assessment certification applications have been submitted or assessed. From April, the Building Safety Regulator will begin the process of requesting building assessment certificate applications to be submitted.

The department has been working closely with the Regulator to ensure the processes are in place so that building assessment certificate applications can be processed in a timely manner.


Division Vote (Commons)
27 Feb 2024 - Leasehold and Freehold Reform Bill - View Vote Context
Royston Smith (Con) voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 293 Conservative No votes vs 2 Conservative Aye votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 179 Noes - 294
Division Vote (Commons)
27 Feb 2024 - Leasehold and Freehold Reform Bill - View Vote Context
Royston Smith (Con) voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 296 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 169 Noes - 306
Division Vote (Commons)
27 Feb 2024 - Leasehold and Freehold Reform Bill - View Vote Context
Royston Smith (Con) voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 291 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 170 Noes - 299
Division Vote (Commons)
27 Feb 2024 - Leasehold and Freehold Reform Bill - View Vote Context
Royston Smith (Con) voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 292 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 171 Noes - 300
Division Vote (Commons)
27 Feb 2024 - Leasehold and Freehold Reform Bill - View Vote Context
Royston Smith (Con) voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 297 Conservative No votes vs 1 Conservative Aye votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 14 Noes - 304
Written Question
Private Rented Housing
Wednesday 21st February 2024

Asked by: Royston Smith (Conservative - Southampton, Itchen)

Question to the Department for Levelling Up, Housing & Communities:

To ask the Secretary of State for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities, what assessment his Department has made of the potential impact of the three properties threshold for qualifying lease status outlined in the Building Safety Act 2022 on the private rented sector.

Answered by Lee Rowley - Minister of State (Minister for Housing)

The Building Safety Act introduced leaseholder protections to ensure leaseholders are safe in their buildings. A threshold which set a balance between those purchasing properties primarily to live in and those who have made commercial or investment decisions, whether freeholders or leaseholders, was therefore needed.

There are protections in place for leaseholders who do not qualify. Building owners and landlords who built defective buildings of at least 11m or at least five storeys, or are associated with those responsible, must pay to remedy historical safety defects for both cladding and non-cladding defects. The principal residence of all leaseholders in relevant buildings will qualify for the protections. In addition, remediation contribution orders and the Defective Premises Act provide routes for leaseholders in relevant buildings to recover remediation costs from those responsible, whatever their qualifying status.


Written Question
Leasehold
Wednesday 21st February 2024

Asked by: Royston Smith (Conservative - Southampton, Itchen)

Question to the Department for Levelling Up, Housing & Communities:

To ask the Secretary of State for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities, what estimate his Department has made of the number of leaseholders that do not meet the criteria for qualifying lease threshold because they own more than three properties.

Answered by Lee Rowley - Minister of State (Minister for Housing)

The Building Safety Act introduced leaseholder protections to ensure leaseholders are safe in their buildings. A threshold which set a balance between those purchasing properties primarily to live in and those who have made commercial or investment decisions, whether freeholders or leaseholders, was therefore needed.

There are protections in place for leaseholders who do not qualify. Building owners and landlords who built defective buildings of at least 11m or at least five storeys, or are associated with those responsible, must pay to remedy historical safety defects for both cladding and non-cladding defects. The principal residence of all leaseholders in relevant buildings will qualify for the protections. In addition, remediation contribution orders and the Defective Premises Act provide routes for leaseholders in relevant buildings to recover remediation costs from those responsible, whatever their qualifying status.


Division Vote (Commons)
20 Feb 2024 - Offshore Petroleum Licensing Bill - View Vote Context
Royston Smith (Con) voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 276 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 286 Noes - 221