Privilege: Conduct of Right Hon. Boris Johnson Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate
Department: Leader of the House

Privilege: Conduct of Right Hon. Boris Johnson

Rosie Winterton Excerpts
Monday 19th June 2023

(10 months, 2 weeks ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Watch Debate Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Lia Nici Portrait Lia Nici (Great Grimsby) (Con)
- View Speech - Hansard - - - Excerpts

I have to speak in the House today because I cannot see where the evidence is that Boris Johnson misled Parliament knowingly, intentionally or recklessly. [Interruption.] I am from Grimsby, and I have to say it as I see it. [Interruption.]

Rosie Winterton Portrait Madam Deputy Speaker (Dame Rosie Winterton)
- Hansard - -

Order, it is important to listen to the hon. Lady.

--- Later in debate ---
Lia Nici Portrait Lia Nici
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I thank my right hon. Friend for that. Of course—[Interruption.]

Rosie Winterton Portrait Madam Deputy Speaker
- Hansard - -

Order. We really must hear what the hon. Lady has to say. It is not fair just to mutter away when she is making her argument.

Lia Nici Portrait Lia Nici
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

Thank you, Madam Deputy Speaker. I thank my right hon. Friend for identifying that. Of course, he is absolutely right. I have to say that I do respect the amount of hard work put into the report, but if, in my former job as a college lecturer, I was grading this, I would say it is not impartial. It says Boris Johnson “claimed” and Boris Johnson “purported”, and that is not impartial language. Therefore, in my opinion, the report is not impartial in the way it is written.

To go back to my original point, on the day that the Sue Gray report was published, the Prime Minister was horrified to read what had been going on, and at no time did anybody on oath give evidence to this inquiry that they reported that there were parties or rule-breaking to the Prime Minister. Now, some people might say, “Well, he lived in No. 10—he should have known.” Actually, those people who have worked in No. 10 will know that it is a rabbit warren of rooms with thick walls, the people working there are running the country and the Prime Minister is not the caretaker of the building. It is not the Prime Minister’s job to go round, look in rooms and decide who may be working and who may not be working. In fact, the Sue Gray report did state that unelected officials were rude to doorkeepers and staff, yet given that No. 10 is full of police officers and security people, if the rules were being broken and that was seen, why did nobody report that to the Prime Minister so that he was aware of it?

--- Later in debate ---
William Cash Portrait Sir William Cash
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

On the point the hon. Gentleman was just making—

Rosie Winterton Portrait Madam Deputy Speaker (Dame Rosie Winterton)
- Hansard - -

Order. I think the hon. Member for Rhondda (Sir Chris Bryant) is giving way to Sir Jacob Rees-Mogg.

Jacob Rees-Mogg Portrait Sir Jacob Rees-Mogg
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I am sorry to interrupt my hon. Friend the Member for Stone (Sir William Cash). The hon. Member for Rhondda (Sir Chris Bryant) is absolutely right—we must maintain exclusive cognisance—but that does not mean we should not follow a proper process and a fair process, or admit that this is ostensibly political.

--- Later in debate ---
None Portrait Several hon. Members rose—
- Hansard -

Rosie Winterton Portrait Madam Deputy Speaker (Dame Rosie Winterton)
- Hansard - -

Order. There are still a great many Members who want to contribute to the debate. I would advise that if they speak for about 10 minutes each, we will probably be able to get everyone in with equal amounts of speaking time.