BHS Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate

Robert Jenrick

Main Page: Robert Jenrick (Conservative - Newark)
Monday 6th June 2016

(8 years, 6 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
Anna Soubry Portrait Anna Soubry
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

This is the sort of conversation that I should have with the hon. Gentleman, because this subject is not within my field expertise or ministerial brief—I will be quite frank about that—but if he is right, that is obviously of concern. I am more than happy to speak to him about the matter, but he is quite right to identify that the main thing for consideration today should be all those who find themselves without a job.

Robert Jenrick Portrait Robert Jenrick (Newark) (Con)
- Hansard - -

It is becoming increasingly clear that Philip Green, aided by weak directors such as Lord Grabiner, washed his hands of the business because it was doomed and had a doomed pension scheme. There is a long-established principle in English law that a seller should not have to vouch for their successor—caveat emptor—but is it not time that the Minister, perhaps aided by the inquiries of this House and others, revisited that in instances where a seller recklessly or knowingly sells their stake in a business to somebody who is completely unsuited and unable to meet creditors’ demands?

Anna Soubry Portrait Anna Soubry
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I really do thank my hon. Friend for that important and incredibly profound point. We are holding an investigation, and there will no doubt be many questions at its conclusion and there may well be some sort of action. He raises an incredibly important point that will undoubtedly be considered seriously by this House and by the Government at the end of the investigations.