To match an exact phrase, use quotation marks around the search term. eg. "Parliamentary Estate". Use "OR" or "AND" as link words to form more complex queries.


Keep yourself up-to-date with the latest developments by exploring our subscription options to receive notifications direct to your inbox

Division Vote (Commons)
4 Feb 2026 - Climate Change - View Vote Context
Robert Jenrick (RUK) voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 8 Reform UK No votes vs 0 Reform UK Aye votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 392 Noes - 116
Division Vote (Commons)
3 Feb 2026 - Universal Credit (Removal of Two Child Limit) Bill - View Vote Context
Robert Jenrick (RUK) voted Aye - against a party majority and in line with the House
One of 2 Reform UK Aye votes vs 5 Reform UK No votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 458 Noes - 104
Speech in Commons Chamber - Mon 02 Feb 2026
US Department of Justice Release of Files

"Appointing Peter Mandelson to our premier ambassadorship was always a grotesque error of judgment by the Prime Minister, given everything we knew about this man. Now we are told that this man leaked confidential information to a convicted sex offender when he was a Cabinet Minister and took tens of …..."
Robert Jenrick - View Speech

View all Robert Jenrick (RUK - Newark) contributions to the debate on: US Department of Justice Release of Files

Speech in Commons Chamber - Thu 22 Jan 2026
Local Government Reorganisation

"First, would the Secretary of State stop saying this is a locally led process. The power rests solely with him, and each of these delays is his decision and his decision alone.

Secondly, the real question here is: why are elections to be delayed for a second year? When I …..."

Robert Jenrick - View Speech

View all Robert Jenrick (RUK - Newark) contributions to the debate on: Local Government Reorganisation

Speech in Commons Chamber - Thu 22 Jan 2026
Local Government Reorganisation

"For two years!..."
Robert Jenrick - View Speech

View all Robert Jenrick (RUK - Newark) contributions to the debate on: Local Government Reorganisation

Speech in Commons Chamber - Wed 21 Jan 2026
Oral Answers to Questions

"One of the last meetings that I took as shadow Justice Secretary was with the parents of Lenny Scott. Lenny Scott was an exceptionally brave prison officer who uncovered corruption in his prison. He left the service, and years later he was hunted down and brutally murdered. Because he died …..."
Robert Jenrick - View Speech

View all Robert Jenrick (RUK - Newark) contributions to the debate on: Oral Answers to Questions

Division Vote (Commons)
20 Jan 2026 - Diego Garcia Military Base and British Indian Ocean Territory Bill - View Vote Context
Robert Jenrick (RUK) voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 7 Reform UK No votes vs 0 Reform UK Aye votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 344 Noes - 182
Division Vote (Commons)
20 Jan 2026 - Diego Garcia Military Base and British Indian Ocean Territory Bill - View Vote Context
Robert Jenrick (RUK) voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 7 Reform UK No votes vs 0 Reform UK Aye votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 347 Noes - 185
Division Vote (Commons)
20 Jan 2026 - Diego Garcia Military Base and British Indian Ocean Territory Bill - View Vote Context
Robert Jenrick (RUK) voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 7 Reform UK No votes vs 0 Reform UK Aye votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 347 Noes - 184
Written Question
Abu Zubaydah
Monday 19th January 2026

Asked by: Robert Jenrick (Reform UK - Newark)

Question to the Attorney General:

To ask the Solicitor General, on what specific date the Attorney General recused himself from discussions or decisions regarding the Government’s defence and settlement of Zubaydah v Foreign and Commonwealth Office; and whether he has had any communication with the Foreign Secretary, her predecessor, or any officials regarding this case since his appointment.

Answered by Ellie Reeves - Solicitor General (Attorney General's Office)

Without commenting on individual cases, the government’s robust conflict process would clearly preclude Law Officers having any involvement in cases in which they were instructed for other parties prior to appointment.

By longstanding convention, recognised in paragraph 5.14 of the Ministerial Code, the fact that the Law Officers have advised or have not advised, and the content of their advice, must not be disclosed outside government without their authority.