Debates between Rachel Reeves and Lord Stunell during the 2010-2015 Parliament

Oral Answers to Questions

Debate between Rachel Reeves and Lord Stunell
Monday 5th September 2011

(13 years, 2 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
Lord Stunell Portrait Andrew Stunell
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

It is certainly proper for local planning authorities to take into account windfall sites, but it is also necessary for every planning authority to ensure that it has sound evidence-based proposals for housing in particular, as well as for other development. I know that my hon. Friend is particularly concerned about the situation in Leeds, and it is really for Leeds to develop its evidence base so that plans can go forward in a sensible and sustainable way.

Rachel Reeves Portrait Rachel Reeves (Leeds West) (Lab)
- Hansard - -

Kirkstall Forge in Leeds West is a brownfield site that has planning permission for 1,000 new homes. However, if they are going to get built, the Department for Transport needs to invest in a new railway station, which, as things currently stand, is on hold. Is there any joined-up thinking in this Government to ensure that such developments get the go-ahead and deliver much needed new homes?

Lord Stunell Portrait Andrew Stunell
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

The hon. Lady has made her point, so let me make mine, which is that it is very much for the planning authority approving a development to see what the associated infrastructure should be and how to create the investment force that can deliver it. The new homes bonus will deliver a substantial amount of additional money to Leeds, which can borrow against it in advance to develop the infrastructure that it needs.