Onshore Wind Subsidies Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate

Philip Hollobone

Main Page: Philip Hollobone (Conservative - Kettering)

Onshore Wind Subsidies

Philip Hollobone Excerpts
Monday 22nd June 2015

(9 years, 6 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
Amber Rudd Portrait Amber Rudd
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I am afraid the hon. Gentleman has not quite understood the proposal, which is that the onshore wind subsidy will not go ahead after March 2016. That is not money that is being clawed back; that is money that is additionally not being added to people’s bills. On another matter, I agree with him that we would like more success in the whole marine energy area, and it is partly because we want to make sure that we have sufficient support available for other technologies, such as marine and tidal wave, that we have to make this choice.

Philip Hollobone Portrait Mr Philip Hollobone (Kettering) (Con)
- Hansard - -

In response to an earlier question, my right hon. Friend the Secretary of State said that the subsidy regime for large-scale solar farms was also going to be cut. What is there to stop an applicant for a large-scale solar farm parcelling up that application into four or five separate applications, thus qualifying as a small-scale unit?

Amber Rudd Portrait Amber Rudd
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

My hon. Friend makes a very good point. He is right that we have ended the large-scale solar farm issue in terms of applications for the renewables obligation, but I have concerns about exactly the possibility that he has raised, and I will address it in the feed-in tariff review that I will be conducting this summer.