Marriage (Same Sex Couples) Bill (Programme) (No. 2) Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate

Marriage (Same Sex Couples) Bill (Programme) (No. 2)

Peter Bone Excerpts
Monday 20th May 2013

(11 years, 7 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
Peter Bone Portrait Mr Peter Bone (Wellingborough) (Con)
- Hansard - -

I do not agree. The problem is that if we debate the programme motion, we eat into time that is required for us to debate the subject, but it is absurd that such a major constitutional change is being rushed through under a timetable motion. Today, we should have been able to speak until any hour. This is such an important issue; we should debate it fully, but this will be a joke.

Tom Harris Portrait Mr Tom Harris (Glasgow South) (Lab)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I am intrigued; if the hon. Gentleman believes that no constitutional measure should have a programme motion attached to it, will he make exactly the same argument when and if we come to debate a European referendum?

Peter Bone Portrait Mr Bone
- Hansard - -

I absolutely agree with the hon. Gentleman. He is fundamentally right that there should not be these programme motions, and I congratulate him on pointing that out. When we divide on the motion, I look forward to him going into the same Lobby as me.

This happens when the three main parties agree on a controversial motion. They try to force it through without proper scrutiny. Tonight, the amendments relating to a referendum will probably not even be reached. It was really appalling when Labour acted in this way, and it is absolutely appalling that we are doing the same thing now.