Dismissal of Ian Faletto, Lymington Stationmaster Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate

Dismissal of Ian Faletto, Lymington Stationmaster

Peter Bone Excerpts
Tuesday 5th July 2011

(13 years, 5 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
Desmond Swayne Portrait Mr Desmond Swayne (New Forest West) (Con)
- Hansard - - Excerpts

The excellent and award-winning stationmaster of Lymington was sacked for removing a shopping trolley from the line before a train could collide with it. The vicar of Pennington collected 8,400 signatures and sought to deliver them to South West Trains, but in an act of shocking discourtesy to the travelling public, the company refused to take them. It is therefore my privilege to present to this House the petition of the vicar of Pennington, which calls on this honourable House to enlist the support of the Department of Transport to intercede with South West Trains to reconsider this shocking injustice.

Following is the full text of the Petition:

[The Humble Petition of Revd Alex Russell, Vicar of Pennington,

Sheweth that a great injustice has been done by the dismissal of Ian Faletto Stationmaster at Lymington.

Wherefore your Petitioner prays that your Honourable House calls upon the Government to request that South West Trains reconsider their decision in the light of his many years of exemplary service to the public

And your Petitioner, as in duty bound, will ever pray, &c.]

[P000928]

Redevelopment of Rushden Hospital Site

Peter Bone Portrait Mr Peter Bone (Wellingborough) (Con)
- Hansard -

To follow that is impossible, but my petition is of more importance to my constituents, because the hospital site, where there is of course no longer a hospital, has always been an area where it was planned that we should eventually have a hospital. Unfortunately, the NHS plans to sell it off and 270 local residents have signed a petition, led by Sheila Vickers. I shall read the petition where the point is well made:

The Humble Petition of residents of Rushden, Northamptonshire and the surrounding areas,

Sheweth,

that the proposed revised redevelopment of the Rushden Hospital site for housing is unpopular, ill-advised and detrimental to the residents of Rushden; that over 25% of the residents of Rushden petitioned the House of Commons for a new outpatient facility in the town, the majority wanting the new facility on the Rushden hospital site; that the proposal to build housing on the site instead of an NHS facility is unacceptable and the impact on the surrounding roads of a large housing development and the density of the development and the proposed cut-through to the Greenacre Drive Estate is wholly detrimental to local residents and notes that a similar proposal for housing development on this site was not approved by East Northamptonshire District Council.

Wherefore your Petitioners pray that your Honourable House urges the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government to urge the Department of Health to withdraw the revised planning application and further urges him to request that the District Council of East Northamptonshire and the County Council and the Primary Care Trust work together to provide a suitable health facility on the site.

And your Petitioners, as in duty bound, will ever pray, &c.

[P000937]