Oral Answers to Questions Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate
Department: Department for Transport

Oral Answers to Questions

Pauline Latham Excerpts
Thursday 12th September 2013

(10 years, 8 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
The hon. Member for Caithness, Sutherland and Easter Ross, representing the House of Commons Commission, was asked—
Pauline Latham Portrait Pauline Latham (Mid Derbyshire) (Con)
- Hansard - -

4. What progress has been made on the restoration and renewal of the Palace of Westminster; and if he will make a statement.

Viscount Thurso Portrait John Thurso (Caithness, Sutherland and Easter Ross)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

Following consideration of the study report on the condition of the fabric of the Palace, the House of Commons Commission and the House of Lords House Committee agreed, in October last year, to commission a comprehensive independent cost appraisal of a range of options for the restoration and renewal of the Palace of Westminster. The opportunity to prepare the independent options appraisal has been advertised, and six interested bidders who met the brief qualification requirements have been invited to submit a proposal. The deadline for submissions is 11 October. It is anticipated that the successful tenderer will begin work in January 2014.

Pauline Latham Portrait Pauline Latham
- Hansard - -

My concern is that if we decant from this place for five years, which has been rumoured, new Members in 2015 might never serve in this Chamber. That would be detrimental to their experience of being in Parliament, if they serve only one term. Is it possible to consider moving us into the House of Lords, with the Lords moving out for the period and us then moving back in?

Viscount Thurso Portrait John Thurso
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I understand that there is precedent for that. The purpose of the independent options appraisal is to consider all those points. The critical point is that no decision will be possible until the next Parliament, so no decision will be taken on whatever option may be thought best until sometime in the next Parliament. It will be the Parliament after that before the decision is implemented. The key factor is that all Members of both Houses want to achieve the best value for money for the taxpayer, who will ultimately be paying for this. That should be the guiding principle, provided we can work appropriately.