Benefit Claimants Sanctions (Required Assessment) Bill Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate

Paula Sherriff

Main Page: Paula Sherriff (Labour - Dewsbury)

Benefit Claimants Sanctions (Required Assessment) Bill

Paula Sherriff Excerpts
Friday 2nd December 2016

(8 years ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
Mhairi Black Portrait Mhairi Black
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I thank my hon. Friend very much. To go back to my point, “I, Daniel Blake” shows the kind of situation raised by my hon. and learned Friend the Member for Edinburgh South West (Joanna Cherry). Daniel Blake is forced to move on to jobseeker’s allowance because the DWP says that he is fit for work, and he is left in limbo, while he waits on a mysterious decision maker to decide whether he is actually fit for work, despite the doctor having already made it clear that he is not. Blake is then told by his DWP work coach that he is not making enough effort to get a job, and he is subsequently referred for a sanction.

Paula Sherriff Portrait Paula Sherriff (Dewsbury) (Lab)
- Hansard - -

A constituent of mine missed an appointment because his baby daughter was rushed into hospital as an emergency, and he was therefore sanctioned. He came to my office when looking for the nearest food bank. As a nation, should we not be absolutely ashamed that this sort of thing is happening, and should not the Government hold their head in shame?

Mhairi Black Portrait Mhairi Black
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I entirely and completely agree. That is the perfect example of someone who, under the Bill, would be exempt from a sanction because of their caring responsibilities. Those in charge would see that someone whose child is ill or has an emergency of course needs, as a parent, to be with them.