Terrorism Prevention and Investigation Measures Bill Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate
Department: Home Office

Terrorism Prevention and Investigation Measures Bill

Patrick Mercer Excerpts
Tuesday 29th November 2011

(12 years, 5 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Hazel Blears Portrait Hazel Blears
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

The hon. Gentleman speaks, as he did in Committee, from a position of great personal knowledge—in many ways, far greater than mine or my colleagues’—from having had operational responsibility on the ground in similar circumstances. He understands that, although we are all reluctant to go down this path, on occasion it is necessary. However, we have a democratic framework—people can challenge the orders; they can go to court; they can litigate; they can launch appeals—which is absolutely as it should be.

Patrick Mercer Portrait Patrick Mercer (Newark) (Con)
- Hansard - -

Will the right hon. Lady give way?

Hazel Blears Portrait Hazel Blears
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I will, but then I want to ask the Minister a couple of questions in the time remaining.

Patrick Mercer Portrait Patrick Mercer
- Hansard - -

The right hon. Lady makes some extremely good points. I agree with my hon. and gallant Friend the Member for Beckenham (Bob Stewart)—and the hon. Member for Islington North (Jeremy Corbyn)—that such measures are the very last things that we want to impose. Next year will be full of difficult periods, including not just the Olympic games, but the royal jubilee. Although I still feel that the powers are inadequate or wrong, they are better than what we had before, so should we not have them? Why are we delaying this? Should we not have powers that are more effective introduced quickly, rather than slowly?

Hazel Blears Portrait Hazel Blears
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I do not accept the premise that the TPIMs regime will be more effective. DAC Osborne said in evidence that control orders were effective, that the police were used to dealing with them and that relocation was the single most useful power. He also said that control orders provided not only surveillance, but disruption, and were therefore more effective. DAC Osborne recognised that the TPIMs regime would involve a greater level of risk. The Minister said that that risk would be dealt with by the extra resources. We must wait and see, but the police themselves said that, far from being more effective, the move from control orders to TPIMs would be less effective because it would increase the measure of risk.