EU Withdrawal Agreement: Legal Changes Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate
Department: Department for Exiting the European Union

Owen Paterson

Main Page: Owen Paterson (Conservative - North Shropshire)

Department Debates - View all Owen Paterson's debates with the Department for Exiting the European Union


Oral Answers to Questions

EU Withdrawal Agreement: Legal Changes

Owen Paterson Excerpts

Points of Order
Monday 11th March 2019

(5 years, 8 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Share Debate
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts

Urgent Questions are proposed each morning by backbench MPs, and up to two may be selected each day by the Speaker. Chosen Urgent Questions are announced 30 minutes before Parliament sits each day.

Each Urgent Question requires a Government Minister to give a response on the debate topic.

This information is provided by Parallel Parliament and does not comprise part of the offical record

Robin Walker Portrait Mr Walker
- Hansard -
- - Excerpts

I think that the right hon. Gentleman should await developments later today and see what the Government put forward tomorrow. I have been very clear that we absolutely stand by the Prime Minister’s commitments on the meaningful vote and on what follows.

Owen Paterson Portrait Mr Owen Paterson (North Shropshire) (Con)
- Hansard -
-

I welcome my hon. Friend to the Dispatch Box and congratulate him and his colleagues on getting the European Union to agree to set up a taskforce or workstream to work up the Malthouse compromise proposals. Will he commit to getting those into the legally binding text, so that there will be an implementation date that is fixed for the future?

Robin Walker Portrait Mr Walker
- Hansard -
- - Excerpts

I know that my right hon. Friend speaks with considerable experience in these issues. The alternative arrangements have been a crucial part of this conversation, and they will continue to play an important part in our negotiations. We are seeking legally binding changes.

Return to start of debate - Return to top of page