“My arguments and witnesses are not properly represented in the report. My lawyers are astounded by the procedure and said if Parliamentary privilege were surrendered and we had open access to a judge in court, the whole process would be chucked out.” My @Daily_Express interview. https://t.co/CUeGn4bBCf
"This process isn’t fair and that is why it hasn’t got to the truth." "There are 17 witnesses who say not guilty …In Parliament of all places this should not happen …rights to a fair and proper process must be upheld" My experienced lawyer Philip Barden. https://t.co/h1Pq2762fA
Full interview about the errors in the Standards Committee processes and judgement against me - a complete breach of natural justice. It would be struck out by a court if Parliamentary Privilege were dropped. https://t.co/1OEeWqnKhh
"Anybody with any common sense could see that this process has been handled shockingly badly. The person suspected of breaching rules should be interviewed and witnesses spoken to before any decision" - my daughter's view on the Standards Committee report. https://t.co/bTvrz19iKS
"When Ms Stone refused to see witnesses, the committee should have instructed her to see them or interviewed witnesses themselves. They did not. For this failure alone, the case would have been struck down had it gone to court for review." - @DavidDavisMP. https://t.co/4NFTH9x5vM
Essential reading from Charles Moore explaining some of the wider implications of the Standards Committee case against me. https://t.co/ZDuuXBYIE2
Excellent news that the Transport Secretary @grantshapps sees the strength of the case we made for reopening the #Oswestry-Gobowen line and that he shares the enthusiasm we all have for it locally. Funding will turn the hard work of @CambrianChr volunteers into reality. https://t.co/P7DE3CVpt1