Draft Trade Union Act 2016 (Political Funds) (Transition Period) Regulations 2017 Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate
Department: Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy

Draft Trade Union Act 2016 (Political Funds) (Transition Period) Regulations 2017

Oliver Letwin Excerpts
Wednesday 25th January 2017

(7 years, 3 months ago)

General Committees
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Oliver Letwin Portrait Sir Oliver Letwin (West Dorset) (Con)
- Hansard - -

I was not going to contribute to this debate, but this is a rare occurrence in the more than 20 years that I have been in Parliament. I have seldom been persuaded by comments made in the Chamber or in Committee. I shall vote for these regulations, on the grounds that the Government have to have something in place, and on the grounds that, unlike Opposition Members, I am an extremely strong supporter of the idea that people should have to make a positive decision to contribute to a political fund. I was therefore a strong supporter of the legislation. I have to say, however, that Opposition Members have made serious practical points about the timing of conferences and the dates. Speaking as one who supports the underlying legislation, it would be a mistake to organise things in such a way as to create unnecessary practical difficulties.

I therefore urge the Minister to go back to the Department when the measure is, I hope, agreed to, and reconsider whether a further, revising statutory instrument to extend the period slightly—I stress “slightly”—would make sense. That should not become an excuse for an indefinite or prolonged delay, as I am sure that the entire Government and the entire Conservative party support the measure. It should be made real and be brought in during 2018, but it is worth considering whether the game is worth the candle, given that we are talking about three to five months’ delay, and given what is being said about the timing of the conferences.