National Planning Policy Framework Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate

National Planning Policy Framework

Natascha Engel Excerpts
Tuesday 27th March 2012

(12 years, 1 month ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
Greg Clark Portrait Greg Clark
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

Two factors are relevant to that question. The first is the intended abolition of the regional strategies, with their targets. That will remove the imposition on local councils of those targets, as will be the case with other targets. The policy also contains the ability for local councils to map and set criteria for where renewable energy would be appropriate, and to use those criteria for subsequent applications to determine what would—and, by implication, would not—be appropriate in each of their areas.

Natascha Engel Portrait Natascha Engel (North East Derbyshire) (Lab)
- Hansard - -

The Secretary of State prides himself on being a blunt-speaking, plain-speaking Yorkshireman. Will the Minister adopt some of that plain speaking and give the House a definition of the word “sustainable” that people in Yorkshire, Derbyshire and even Kent can understand?

Greg Clark Portrait Greg Clark
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

We followed the suggestion of the Communities and Local Government Committee and used the classic Brundtland definition, which is about protecting the ability of future generations to enjoy the benefits that the present generation enjoys. We have also included the five principles of the UK’s sustainable development strategy. In practice, the policies outlined in the national planning policy framework will determine, in each case, what is and is not sustainable. For example, it is not sustainable to have a shopping development outside the town centre and it is not sustainable to build in the green belt. There is a high level of definition, and the practical application is very clear in the policies.