To match an exact phrase, use quotation marks around the search term. eg. "Parliamentary Estate". Use "OR" or "AND" as link words to form more complex queries.


Keep yourself up-to-date with the latest developments by exploring our subscription options to receive notifications direct to your inbox

Division Vote (Commons)
12 Mar 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context
Mel Stride (Con) voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 95 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 333 Noes - 100
Division Vote (Commons)
12 Mar 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context
Mel Stride (Con) voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 92 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 333 Noes - 100
Division Vote (Commons)
12 Mar 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context
Mel Stride (Con) voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 98 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 168 Noes - 314
Division Vote (Commons)
12 Mar 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context
Mel Stride (Con) voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 94 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 167 Noes - 328
Division Vote (Commons)
12 Mar 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context
Mel Stride (Con) voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 95 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 164 Noes - 324
Division Vote (Commons)
12 Mar 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context
Mel Stride (Con) voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 96 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 337 Noes - 98
Written Question
Universal Credit
Wednesday 12th March 2025

Asked by: Mel Stride (Conservative - Central Devon)

Question to the Department for Work and Pensions:

To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, what her Department's timetable is for abolishing the couple's administrative earnings threshold; and what estimate she has made of the potential impact of the abolition of the couple's administrative earnings threshold on the number of people entering the Intensive Work Search regime.

Answered by Alison McGovern - Minister of State (Department for Work and Pensions)

The previous administration planned to abolish the Couples AET to increase compliance and conditionality requirements on working households, without clear evidence that this would be cost-effective. The Government’s plans for supporting working households towards sustainable good quality jobs are set out in the Get Britain Working white paper.


Division Vote (Commons)
11 Mar 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context
Mel Stride (Con) voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 97 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 106 Noes - 340
Division Vote (Commons)
11 Mar 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context
Mel Stride (Con) voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 97 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 189 Noes - 324
Division Vote (Commons)
11 Mar 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context
Mel Stride (Con) voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 96 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 105 Noes - 409