Crustacean Mortality in North-east England: Independent Expert Assessment Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate
Department: Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs

Crustacean Mortality in North-east England: Independent Expert Assessment

Matthew Offord Excerpts
Thursday 26th January 2023

(1 year, 10 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Watch Debate Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Mark Spencer Portrait Mark Spencer
- View Speech - Hansard - - - Excerpts

It is about taking advice from those scientists and working with them so that they can establish the facts behind what caused this disease. As much as the House and I want to find the actual cause of this die-off, we have to face the scientific fact that if that event does not repeat itself—I sincerely hope it does not—we may never find its cause. If it is repeated, those scientists are ready to jump into action at great speed to try to establish the facts.

Matthew Offord Portrait Dr Matthew Offord (Hendon) (Con)
- View Speech - Hansard - -

This is a classic case of environmental research that is contested. The independent panel’s report has clearly come up with no theoretical explanation of why this has happened. The British Ports Association says that there are not sufficient quantities of pyridine to have caused mass die-off. That is also contested by academics, particularly Dr Gary Caldwell at Newcastle University, who says that there are. As Lord Benyon has said to the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Committee that there should be more testing, can we allow Dr Caldwell to undertake deep sediment samples? We can then rule it out if there is not enough of the pathogen to kill the crabs in these quantities, or determine that he is correct.

Mark Spencer Portrait Mark Spencer
- View Speech - Hansard - - - Excerpts

It should be clear to my hon. Friend that Dr Caldwell was in correspondence with the expert panel, and they exchanged a number of pieces of correspondence. The evidence that was put forward by that individual scientist was considered by the expert panel in coming to its conclusions.