Debates between Matt Western and Dan Poulter during the 2019-2024 Parliament

Mon 13th Jun 2022

Higher Education (Freedom of Speech) Bill

Debate between Matt Western and Dan Poulter
Matt Western Portrait Matt Western
- Hansard - -

The right hon. Member was very involved in the Committee, and I thought that his contributions were robust and helped the debate along. I do not mean to misrepresent what Professor Arif Ahmed may have said, and he did say that this should be impartial. However, it was clear from what was said by Professor Biggar that that will not be possible if the Government want to do what they have set out to do. This is the point that I was trying to make, and if I did not make it clearly I apologise, but I have certainly tried to put it back on the record now.

Dan Poulter Portrait Dr Dan Poulter (Central Suffolk and North Ipswich) (Con)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

Is the shadow Minister suggesting that by previous political association, someone can never be impartial in any possible future appointment?

Matt Western Portrait Matt Western
- Hansard - -

I do not want to suggest that all people come from a position of partiality, but some are more partial—and overtly partial—than others. That was the whole point of what I tried to illustrate in the case of the chair of the Office for Students, who was clearly appointed according to the preference of the Government at the very highest level and the Prime Minister. I think that that surprise appointment, along with the appointment of the board member with no previous experience, is a further illustration of just how rabid this has become in our politics.