To match an exact phrase, use quotation marks around the search term. eg. "Parliamentary Estate". Use "OR" or "AND" as link words to form more complex queries.


Keep yourself up-to-date with the latest developments by exploring our subscription options to receive notifications direct to your inbox

Division Vote (Commons)
2 Jul 2025 - Competition - View Vote Context
Matt Bishop (Lab) voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 327 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 338 Noes - 79
Division Vote (Commons)
1 Jul 2025 - Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill - View Vote Context
Matt Bishop (Lab) voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 325 Labour No votes vs 42 Labour Aye votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 149 Noes - 328
Division Vote (Commons)
1 Jul 2025 - Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill - View Vote Context
Matt Bishop (Lab) voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 333 Labour Aye votes vs 49 Labour No votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 335 Noes - 260
Written Question
Severn River Crossing: Large Goods Vehicles
Tuesday 24th June 2025

Asked by: Matt Bishop (Labour - Forest of Dean)

Question to the Department for Transport:

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, what assessment she has made of the potential impact of the HGV weight restriction on the M48 Severn Bridge on (a) haulers, (b) congestion and (c) businesses in (i) Forest of Dean constituency and (ii) surrounding areas; and what steps her Department is taking to (A) identify and (b) implement a solution to the weight restriction.

Answered by Lilian Greenwood - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Transport)

The weight restriction on the M48 Severn Bridge was introduced by National Highways as a safety measure following the identification of deterioration in the bridge’s main suspension cables. To keep the bridge open to the majority of traffic, vehicles over 7.5 tonnes, have been temporarily restricted.

National Highways carried out traffic modelling to understand potential impacts, including on hauliers, congestion and rerouting in areas such as the Forest of Dean and nearby junctions. The decision to impose a weight restriction followed a review of alternative options and was considered the most effective way to address safety concerns while limiting disruption.

National Highways has engaged with local authorities, industry bodies and operators to keep them informed. A dedicated team is progressing work on a medium-term traffic management solution, which is currently in the feasibility stage. The restriction is expected to remain in place for 12 to 18 months subject to further investigations, with updates provided to stakeholders as work progresses.


Division Vote (Commons)
20 Jun 2025 - Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill - View Vote Context
Matt Bishop (Lab) voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 224 Labour Aye votes vs 160 Labour No votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 314 Noes - 291
Written Question
Mobile Phones and Research: Young People
Thursday 19th June 2025

Asked by: Matt Bishop (Labour - Forest of Dean)

Question to the Department for Science, Innovation & Technology:

To ask the Secretary of State for Science, Innovation and Technology, when he plans to publish research on the impact of (a) smartphones and (b) social media on young people.

Answered by Feryal Clark - Parliamentary Under Secretary of State (Department for Science, Innovation and Technology)

The Government is continuing to explore how the evidence base on the impact of social media on children can be improved.

This is why in December 2024, DSIT commissioned a feasibility study on methods and data to understand the impact of smartphones and social media on children.

The Government is currently considering the findings of the feasibility study and will publish the results in due course.


Division Vote (Commons)
18 Jun 2025 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context
Matt Bishop (Lab) voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 304 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 114 Noes - 310
Division Vote (Commons)
18 Jun 2025 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context
Matt Bishop (Lab) voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 302 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 312 Noes - 95
Division Vote (Commons)
18 Jun 2025 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context
Matt Bishop (Lab) voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 304 Labour No votes vs 3 Labour Aye votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 178 Noes - 313
Division Vote (Commons)
18 Jun 2025 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context
Matt Bishop (Lab) voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 306 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 178 Noes - 313