All 1 Martin Docherty-Hughes contributions to the Non-Domestic Rating (Nursery Grounds) Act 2018

Read Bill Ministerial Extracts

Wed 23rd May 2018
Points of Order
Commons Chamber

1st reading: House of Commons & 1st reading: House of Commons

Points of Order Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate

Points of Order

Martin Docherty-Hughes Excerpts
1st reading: House of Commons
Wednesday 23rd May 2018

(6 years, 6 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
John Bercow Portrait Mr Speaker
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I will come to the hon. Gentleman, of course, but I call Andrew Bridgen.

--- Later in debate ---
John Bercow Portrait Mr Speaker
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I am saving the hon. Gentleman up, as I often say. I do not want to squander him at too early a stage of our proceedings. I call Mr Martin Docherty-Hughes.

Martin Docherty-Hughes Portrait Martin Docherty-Hughes
- Hansard - -

On a point of order, Mr Speaker. Two hundred days have passed since my constituent Jagtar Singh Johal was held in India without charge, with accusations of torture and with trial by media. I am grateful to Ministers who have engaged with me so far in holding the Indian authorities to account. Nevertheless, I have now written to the Prime Minister twice, without formal response other than a holding response from their office. Will you assure me that all Ministers of State take their responsibilities seriously in responding fully to a constituency Member of the House of Commons on a critical matter involving a constituent—a UK citizen, and a true son of the Rock of Dumbarton—who has made accusations of torture against a close ally?

John Bercow Portrait Mr Speaker
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I hope that these matters are always treated with the utmost seriousness and that responses to parliamentary colleagues are both timely and substantive. I say to the hon. Gentleman, without fear of contradiction, that that notion of a timely and substantive response should apply both in relation to parliamentary answers to parliamentary questions and in relation to correspondence. I was not familiar with all the details of this matter, although the hon. Gentleman has apprised me of some of them, but it is of course important that these matters are addressed fully.

A moment ago, we heard from the Father of the House—perhaps I may respond on this point because it is quite an important one for all of us. A former Father of the House, Sir Gerald Kaufman, when he did not receive substantive replies to questions or letters, was given to tabling a written question on the matter, inquiring when he would receive a substantive reply. If I remember correctly, Sir Gerald was inclined to say that that was an extremely effective technique. I volunteer that advice gratis to the hon. Gentleman.