All 1 Margaret Greenwood contributions to the Conversion Practices (Prohibition) Bill 2023-24

Read Bill Ministerial Extracts

Fri 1st Mar 2024

Conversion Practices (Prohibition) Bill Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate
Department: Department for Business and Trade

Conversion Practices (Prohibition) Bill

Margaret Greenwood Excerpts
2nd reading
Friday 1st March 2024

(8 months, 3 weeks ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Conversion Practices (Prohibition) Bill 2023-24 Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Lloyd Russell-Moyle Portrait Lloyd Russell-Moyle
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I will come to exactly that in a moment, but the hon. Member makes valid points that we should address.

Some were worried when I was drawn in the private Member’s Bill ballot that I would produce, as one Whip put it, a “batshit crazy” Bill. Others were worried that I would produce a Bill that would not stop this practice and would have too many loopholes. But after months of meetings, quiet conversations, going on BBC “Politics Live”, offering a meeting to anyone who wanted one and meeting colleagues across this House, all with different views, I hope that the words of the same Whip, saying “Blimey, he’s actually produced something quite sensible” will ring in the ears of everyone in this debate.

Margaret Greenwood Portrait Margaret Greenwood (Wirral West) (Lab)
- Hansard - -

I congratulate my hon. Friend on this incredibly important Bill. A number of constituents have written passionately to me about it. According to the UK Government’s own research, 7% of LGBT people have been offered or have undergone conversion therapy. That indicates that in the last five years thousands of people have been at risk of harm. Does he agree that the scale of it must be recognised, and that it must stop?

Lloyd Russell-Moyle Portrait Lloyd Russell-Moyle
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I quite agree. I understand from previous conversations that the Government do not outright oppose the Bill—we will see how the Minister responds today, as that might have slightly changed. It is quite right that they do not oppose it, because they have put forward this proposal numerous times. They are reserving judgment on some of the technicalities. I have given the Government two opportunities to propose amendments in the public consultations that I have run. They proposed no amendments. In fact, the Government agreed to do pre-legislative scrutiny of their own Bill but, six months later, that has not happened.