To match an exact phrase, use quotation marks around the search term. eg. "Parliamentary Estate". Use "OR" or "AND" as link words to form more complex queries.


Keep yourself up-to-date with the latest developments by exploring our subscription options to receive notifications direct to your inbox

Written Question
Windrush Compensation Scheme
Tuesday 6th September 2022

Asked by: Lyn Brown (Labour - West Ham)

Question to the Home Office:

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, whether any applicants to the Windrush Compensation Scheme have been apprehended by immigration enforcement since the launch of that scheme.

Answered by Kevin Foster

In response to question UIN: 41960

Any information provided as part of a compensation claim is solely used for the purpose of assessing that claim. Information provided as part of a compensation claim is held on a separate system, and is not shared outside of the compensation team. Information provided as part of a compensation claim would never be passed on to Immigration Enforcement or used as part of enforcement action.

Immigration Enforcement have put in place safeguards to ensure members of the Windrush generation are not subjected to enforcement action. Whenever a person is encountered who claims to be a member of the Windrush generation or to be in the UK lawfully, they are referred to the Windrush Help Team to consider their case and, if appropriate, issue documentation under the Windrush (status) Scheme confirming their right to be in the UK. No enforcement action is taken against individuals whose status is under review by the Windrush Help Team, or who have an ongoing Windrush (status) Scheme application.

Anyone is free to submit a claim to the Windrush Compensation Scheme, irrespective of whether they are actually eligible for compensation. It is possible for a person who is in the UK unlawfully, and who is not a member of the Windrush generation, to submit an unmeritorious compensation claim. They may, rightly, be subject to enforcement action on the basis of information obtained by Immigration Enforcement independently. We do not hold data on how many compensation claimants have later faced enforcement action.

In response to question UIN: 41961

Since its launch, the Home Office has continued to listen and respond to feedback from affected communities and stakeholders about how the Scheme operates and its accessibility. In response to feedback, we have re-designed the primary claim form to make it easier to complete.

We have designed the compensation scheme to be as clear and simple as possible, so people do not need legal assistance to make a claim. We have published a redesigned primary claim form which now has a Crystal Mark from the Plain English Campaign, demonstrating our commitment to ensuring the scheme is accessible and as easy to use as possible.

The new form includes more targeted and closed questions to help people understand and provide the key information we need from them. We believe the new form will improve peoples’ experiences of applying to the scheme and help to speed up the processing of claims by reducing the amount of additional information and evidence we must ask people to provide.

We have made the evidential threshold as low as possible. Our intent is to ask for the minimum evidence necessary to reduce the burden on individuals, whilst maximising the offers we can make. In doing so we are seeking to strike the right balance between ensuring the scheme is comprehensive and covers the broadest range of circumstances, whilst also making it easy to navigate.

However, for those who want or need support to make a claim, the Home Office provides free assistance in making applications through our independent claims assistance provider - We Are Digital. The Windrush Compensation Scheme Help Team can also assist individuals should they have questions about the claim form or process.

We continue to work extensively with communities and stakeholders to raise awareness of the Scheme and encourage affected individuals to apply.


Written Question
Biometrics
Tuesday 6th September 2022

Asked by: Lyn Brown (Labour - West Ham)

Question to the Home Office:

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, what recent assessment she has made of the (a) accuracy of live facial recognition technology, (b) potential for biased outputs and decision-making from facial recognition technology system operators and (c) the adequacy of criteria for deployment of facial recognition technology.

Answered by Tom Pursglove - Minister of State (Minister for Legal Migration and Delivery)

The Government supports the police using new technologies like facial recognition to protect the public. Whether and how they use it is an operational matter for the police in accordance with the legal framework, and they have published the results.

The College of Policing has published an Authorised Professional Practice, which provides national guidance and addresses the Court of Appeal judgment on Bridges vs South Wales Police. This includes details on how to measure accuracy, the requirement to comply with the public sector equality duty in relation to possible bias, the need for a human decision on whether and how to intervene following an alert for a possible match, and the deployment criteria.


Speech in Commons Chamber - Wed 29 Jun 2022
Metropolitan Police Service

Speech Link

View all Lyn Brown (Lab - West Ham) contributions to the debate on: Metropolitan Police Service

Speech in Commons Chamber - Tue 28 Jun 2022
Community Payback

Speech Link

View all Lyn Brown (Lab - West Ham) contributions to the debate on: Community Payback

Speech in Commons Chamber - Tue 28 Jun 2022
Community Payback

Speech Link

View all Lyn Brown (Lab - West Ham) contributions to the debate on: Community Payback

Speech in Commons Chamber - Tue 28 Jun 2022
Community Payback

Speech Link

View all Lyn Brown (Lab - West Ham) contributions to the debate on: Community Payback

Speech in Commons Chamber - Tue 28 Jun 2022
Community Payback

Speech Link

View all Lyn Brown (Lab - West Ham) contributions to the debate on: Community Payback

Speech in Commons Chamber - Tue 28 Jun 2022
Community Payback

Speech Link

View all Lyn Brown (Lab - West Ham) contributions to the debate on: Community Payback

Written Question
Visas: Married People
Tuesday 21st June 2022

Asked by: Lyn Brown (Labour - West Ham)

Question to the Home Office:

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, what recent estimate her Department has made of the number of spousal visa applications that are awaiting determination; what plans she has to reduce any backlog; and what timescale she expects any backlog to be eliminated.

Answered by Kevin Foster

The Home Office is currently prioritising Ukraine Visa Schemes applications in response to the humanitarian crisis caused by the Russian invasion of Ukraine.

Data is not published on the number of applications which are outstanding. The transparency data does, however, include a range of processing data and the latest data can be found at: Migration transparency data - GOV.UK (www.gov.uk)

Staff from other government departments, including DWP and HMRC, are being surged into the Home Office to help with Ukraine work and enable other normal visa routes to return to normal service levels.


Written Question
Economic Crime
Tuesday 17th May 2022

Asked by: Lyn Brown (Labour - West Ham)

Question to the Home Office:

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, with reference to the Answer of 22 April 2022 to Question 150126 on Economic Crime, how many cases involving money linked to corruption flowing from African states into the UK were prosecuted following National Crime Agency investigations in (a) 2021 and (b) 2022 to date.

Answered by Damian Hinds - Minister of State (Education)

The NCA has had no prosecutions in respect of money linked to corruption flowing from African states during 2021 and 2022.

The NCA does however have a number of long standing investigations with the Crown Prosecution Service, as these are live investigations it would be inappropriate to comment further.