Cycling: Helmets Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate

Lord Walton of Detchant

Main Page: Lord Walton of Detchant (Crossbench - Life peer)

Cycling: Helmets

Lord Walton of Detchant Excerpts
Thursday 23rd October 2014

(10 years, 1 month ago)

Lords Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
Lord Popat Portrait Lord Popat
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

The noble Lord makes an important point and I agree with it. We want to make cycling safe, to encourage more cycling. Last week, a cycling delivery plan was released and was discussed and debated in the other House. It is our ideal aspiration to spend £10. We currently spend £5 per person, compared with £2 in the previous Parliament, so we are continuing to spend more money for safety and more cycling.

Lord Walton of Detchant Portrait Lord Walton of Detchant (CB)
- Hansard - -

My Lords, Dr Hugh Jackson, a Newcastle paediatrician, fronted a major national campaign seeking to persuade the Government of the day that children cycling on public roads should be required by law to wear helmets. He produced some alarming statistics about the incidence of head injuries, many of which could have been prevented—and the children spared the results—by wearing helmets. Is it not time to re-examine this whole issue?

Lord Popat Portrait Lord Popat
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

My Lords, cycling helmets reduce the impact of a collision; they do not prevent collisions. The report mentioned by the noble Lord concluded that cycle helmets would be effective in many accidents but their effectiveness depends on a range of factors such as whether it was a fall or a collision with a vehicle and what object was struck by the road.