Data Retention and Investigatory Powers Bill Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate
Department: Home Office

Data Retention and Investigatory Powers Bill

Lord Wallace of Tankerness Excerpts
Thursday 17th July 2014

(9 years, 9 months ago)

Lords Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Earl of Erroll Portrait The Earl of Erroll
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I am sorry; I am not suggesting that there is any at the moment at all. There has been historically—the Cambridge set. There are problems with people at the top from time to time.

Earl of Erroll Portrait The Earl of Erroll
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

Yes, treason rather than corruption. I do not mind what you want to call it—whatever. All I am saying is that we in Parliament are here to protect the people. We happen to have the senior members of the Executive here as well, which is very useful for holding them to account. But they have to be double-hatted and remember that they are putting in place processes for their successors.

The noble Lord, Lord Rooker, made the point about the public needing to be reassured that the people at the top are being watched. We are seeing enough conspiracy theories emerging in the press at the moment about rings protecting themselves. We do not need any more of those suggestions. That is why I think we need an earlier debate on this. It is not about the technical part of it; it is about reassuring the public that we have the right checks and balances at the top. That is not technical; it is about how we watch people.