Conscientious Objection (Medical Activities) Bill [HL] Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate

Conscientious Objection (Medical Activities) Bill [HL]

Lord Swinfen Excerpts
2nd reading (Hansard): House of Lords
Friday 26th January 2018

(6 years, 10 months ago)

Lords Chamber
Read Full debate Conscientious Objection (Medical Activities) 2017-19 View all Conscientious Objection (Medical Activities) 2017-19 Debates Read Hansard Text
Baroness Barker Portrait Baroness Barker
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I make it absolutely clear. As on all other Benches, we have a variety of beliefs on this subject, but what I can say in all clear conscience is that I represent the majority of my colleagues on these Benches.

Lord Swinfen Portrait Lord Swinfen (Con)
- Hansard - -

Perhaps the noble Baroness will answer one simple question to clarify what I think she said. Am I right in thinking that she said that a medical practitioner who had a conscientious objection to helping with an abortion would still have to help with an abortion if it was necessary? That is what I understood that she said.

Baroness Barker Portrait Baroness Barker
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

For the avoidance of doubt, I agree with the statements made in the court judgment of 2016: that no practitioner should be compelled to take part in the hands-on offering of a procedure, but they cannot indirectly deny women access to treatment to which they are legally entitled.