Coronavirus Job Retention Scheme: Working Parents and School Closures Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate

Lord Singh of Wimbledon

Main Page: Lord Singh of Wimbledon (Crossbench - Life peer)

Coronavirus Job Retention Scheme: Working Parents and School Closures

Lord Singh of Wimbledon Excerpts
Monday 18th January 2021

(3 years, 3 months ago)

Lords Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
Baroness Penn Portrait Baroness Penn (Con)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I say to my noble and learned friend that the decision to shut schools in England was taken by central government. However, we have set out clear, legally binding requirements for local authority and academy schools to provide high-quality remote education, equivalent in length to the core teaching pupils would have received in school: from three hours a day for key stage 1 to five hours a day for key stages 3 and 4.

Lord Singh of Wimbledon Portrait Lord Singh of Wimbledon (CB) [V]
- Hansard - -

My Lords, the TUC report shows the difficulties faced by the parents of children unable to go to school in the Covid lockdown. It is not easy for some to work from home, reschedule work or incur the cost of reducing working hours. Does the Minister agree that we should urgently consider copying the initiatives in Germany and Italy of giving the parents of young children some additional paid leave to help in the present crisis?

Baroness Penn Portrait Baroness Penn (Con)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

My Lords, in international comparisons, our furlough scheme is actually more generous than many other countries’ and has fewer eligibility criteria than other countries’. But the Government completely understand the pressure that working parents are under. That is why we worked hard to keep schools open for as long as possible, and that is why we are working to get transmission rates down as quickly as possible so that we can reopen schools and get children back to the place where they are best off.