Channel 4 Privatisation Debate
Full Debate: Read Full DebateLord Sherbourne of Didsbury
Main Page: Lord Sherbourne of Didsbury (Conservative - Life peer)Department Debates - View all Lord Sherbourne of Didsbury's debates with the Department for Digital, Culture, Media & Sport
(2 years, 7 months ago)
Lords ChamberAt the moment, Channel 4 is uniquely constrained; it can neither borrow nor benefit from private investment in the way that other companies can. We see how you can be a privately owned public service broadcaster—ITV does it very well. What we want is to ensure that Channel 4 is able to borrow, invest and create excellent content, some of which may be critical of the Government and some of which may entertain people. This is not about the output of Channel 4; it is about ensuring that it is fit for the future.
My Lords, does the Minister realise that it was the Labour Party in the 1950s which bitterly opposed the establishment of independent television? He should not be surprised by the reaction of the party opposite.
I am grateful to my noble friend for that reminder; he is absolutely right. It is important that our broadcasting sector continues to innovate and to remain competitive. It is doing so in an increasingly innovative and competitive field.