Immigration: Economic Impact Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate

Lord Rosser

Main Page: Lord Rosser (Labour - Life peer)

Immigration: Economic Impact

Lord Rosser Excerpts
Tuesday 12th November 2013

(11 years, 1 month ago)

Lords Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
Lord Rosser Portrait Lord Rosser (Lab)
- Hansard - -

We recognise that, while there are real benefits from immigration, they are not equally shared, due to inadequate labour standards, exploitation of the supply of low-waged migrant labour and the failure to provide young people with the necessary skills. What steps are the Government taking to see that the minimum wage is properly enforced? Do the Government agree with us that the maximum fine should be doubled to £10,000 and are the Government, like us, also prepared to consider whether the scope of the Gangmasters Licensing Authority needs to be extended to new sectors in order to stop exploitation? Finally, are the Government reviewing sectors that have become dependent on migrant labour, to identify where enough has not been done to equip young people with the skills they need to compete?

Earl Attlee Portrait Earl Attlee
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

The noble Lord asked rather a lot of questions. I share his concern about the exploitation of migrant labour. All employers must adhere to the minimum wage provisions, which apply to migrants as well as to UK natives. There are very few prosecutions for paying below the minimum wage; however, it is normally dealt with by means of fixed penalties and the income is about £700,000 of fixed penalties.