Dogs: Microchipping Debate
Full Debate: Read Full DebateLord Renton of Mount Harry
Main Page: Lord Renton of Mount Harry (Conservative - Life peer)Department Debates - View all Lord Renton of Mount Harry's debates with the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs
(12 years, 9 months ago)
Lords ChamberMy Lords, I think that the mood of the House is that the noble Countess, Lady Mar, has been waiting. Perhaps my noble friend Lord Renton might speak after her.
This is certainly a proposal that we are looking at, and I thank the noble Countess for her contribution.
My Lords, perhaps I may suggest to my noble friend that the Government consider very carefully before insisting on the compulsory microchipping of dogs. Many dogs take badly to having a chip in them; they get very sore and so forth. Surely anyone who cannot control a dog should not have one; that should be the course.
I am not sure that the respondees to the consultation share my noble friend's view on the matter, and I am not sure that the Government share it, either. We see microchipping as one measure we can take to address an increasing problem. The cost of stray dogs is something that we have discussed. The human cost of dog attacks is another matter that the House should bear in mind in considering these measures.