House of Lords: Lord Speaker’s Committee Report Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate

Lord Phillips of Worth Matravers

Main Page: Lord Phillips of Worth Matravers (Crossbench - Life Peer (judicial))

House of Lords: Lord Speaker’s Committee Report

Lord Phillips of Worth Matravers Excerpts
Tuesday 19th December 2017

(6 years, 11 months ago)

Lords Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
Lord Phillips of Worth Matravers Portrait Lord Phillips of Worth Matravers (CB)
- Hansard - -

My Lords, I put down my name to speak in this debate for one reason only: to put on record my enthusiastic support for this report. It is, if I may say so, a masterpiece of skill, wisdom and tact.

The desirability of a reduction in our numbers is, I would suggest, obvious; indeed, it is more than desirable—it is imperative if this is to be a sensible institution. I hope that the response of the vast majority of those taking part in this debate will carry the weight that it deserves with the Prime Minister.

I would like to add one footnote. I believe that those who were involved in the discussions that led to the Constitutional Reform Act shared what lawyers describe as a legitimate expectation. This was that, on retirement, any member of the Supreme Court who so wished would be made a Member of this House. That legitimate expectation has not been met. It is in these circumstances that I am prepared to support, despite some reservations, the proposal made in paragraph 77 of the report, that members of the Supreme Court should receive life peerages on appointment.