Marriage (Same Sex Couples) Bill

Lord Phillips of Sudbury Excerpts
Monday 24th June 2013

(11 years, 4 months ago)

Lords Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
This is a proportionate and necessary amendment to the Bill.
Baroness O'Loan Portrait Baroness O'Loan
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

It provides an accommodation of competing rights, no more, no less. I apologise to the noble Lord, Lord Phillips, but I was two words from the end.

Lord Phillips of Sudbury Portrait Lord Phillips of Sudbury
- Hansard - -

I was anxious that the noble Baroness should not get to the end before I could ask this question. I am sorry if it is a bit technical, but it seems to be relevant. The wording of the amendment, with which I have sympathy, is that the guidance must be,

“in accordance with the tenets of the relevant religion or religious denomination”.

It not abundantly clear to me how one would determine what the tenets of a religion are. If the relevant religion were Christianity, different denominations of Christianity take a different view on these matters. Does the amendment in fact cover all the circumstances that the noble Baroness and her co-movers are concerned about? To make it clear, one can imagine some debate over quite what the tenets of Christianity are as time progresses. An extreme Christian sect might take a very untypical view. A Quaker school, for example, might be well ahead of the Christian pack. Does the noble Baroness think that the amendment covers that potential tension?

Baroness O'Loan Portrait Baroness O'Loan
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

My Lords, I thank the noble Lord for the question. Having read the previous guidance, most recently this morning, I would not anticipate that the guidance would actually specify the tenets of the individual religion. What I would anticipate is that it would have the provision that education must be provided in accordance with the tenets and that there would be, as the right reverend Prelate has provided, a structure of registration and designation of schools, so that there would be a quality assurance process underlying it. If the amendment is not sufficiently concise, I am sure that it will be possible—unless it is pressed to a Division at this stage—to encourage the Minister to respond with a government amendment, which would provide precisely for what is required.

Lord Elton Portrait Lord Elton
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I am so sorry, but I want to ask the noble Baroness a question relevant to the one she had been asked, because it does not seem to me that there is a problem. My noble friend Lord Phillips of Sudbury asked what happens if different denominations have different views but the amendment requires it to be,

“in accordance with the tenets of the relevant religion or religious denomination”,

so it is merely relevant to the school in question.

Lord Phillips of Sudbury Portrait Lord Phillips of Sudbury
- Hansard - -

If I might just elucidate, I said that it was not always clear what the tenets of the religion are, quite apart from the denomination.

Baroness O'Loan Portrait Baroness O'Loan
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

The current guidance provides that schools are entitled to take their religious beliefs into account in providing sex and religious education, so there is a tradition for this and it may be taken forward from that perspective.