NHS: Accident and Emergency Departments Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate

Lord O'Shaughnessy

Main Page: Lord O'Shaughnessy (Conservative - Life peer)

NHS: Accident and Emergency Departments

Lord O'Shaughnessy Excerpts
Tuesday 5th February 2019

(5 years, 9 months ago)

Lords Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
Baroness Manzoor Portrait Baroness Manzoor
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

My Lords, I have already said that performance targets are important. The Academy of Medical Royal Colleges released a statement on 30 January, which said:

“Reviewing, updating and improving the clinical standards to ensure that they remain relevant and appropriate is sensible and overdue. We support an evidence based review that is driven by clinical considerations as to what is appropriate, that informs and promotes changes in service delivery where needed and involves wide input from all relevant parties … any review may suggest change or reinforce current measures”.


I could not have put it better myself.

Lord O'Shaughnessy Portrait Lord O'Shaughnessy (Con)
- Hansard - -

My Lords, the acid test for any waiting-time targets is the clinical outcomes they deliver. In 2017, NHS England recommended—and the department subsequently accepted—reforms to the ambulance waiting-time targets, but that took place only after a two-year clinical trial and an independent assessment by the University of Sheffield of the impact on patients of all kinds of severity. I suggest that, if there is to be movement in this area, it should proceed cautiously and only after following a similarly robust and objective process.

Baroness Manzoor Portrait Baroness Manzoor
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

My Lords, of course I entirely agree with my noble friend. As I have said, there will be robust evaluation, monitoring and assessment before any targets are put in place.