Housing: Discretionary Housing Payment Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate
Department: Department for Work and Pensions

Housing: Discretionary Housing Payment

Lord McAvoy Excerpts
Wednesday 9th April 2014

(10 years, 7 months ago)

Lords Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Asked by
Lord McAvoy Portrait Lord McAvoy
- Hansard - -



To ask Her Majesty’s Government what assessment they have made of the level of discretionary housing payment available to local authorities.

Lord Freud Portrait The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State, Department for Work and Pensions (Lord Freud) (Con)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

My Lords, the department has asked local authorities to provide details regarding their use of discretionary housing payments twice yearly. Details of how local authorities are using discretionary housing payments in the first half of the year were published on 20 December. Despite some people’s predictions, the vast majority of local authorities were managing within their budgets. In 2014-15, local authorities will receive a share of £165 million, which will ensure that they can offer ongoing support where appropriate.

Lord McAvoy Portrait Lord McAvoy (Lab)
- Hansard - -

My Lords, despite assurances from the Minister, 47 councils spent 90% of their DHP budget by February. A third of the councils reported that a third of the applications were refused. Can the Minister tell the House whether he is aware of how many evictions there have been due to bedroom tax arrears? Does he know? Does he care?

Lord Freud Portrait Lord Freud
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

My Lords, the noble Lord used those figures as if they were his; I am sure that he would want to attribute them to another group called False Economy. They show that 85% of councils surveyed had spent less than 90% of their money with one month to go. However, in that particular report, which found that 11 councils had overspent, there were a lot of mistakes. The figures for four of them—Swindon, Haringey, Leeds and Middlesbrough—were simply wrong.