Aviation: Passenger Duty Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate

Lord Mawhinney

Main Page: Lord Mawhinney (Conservative - Life peer)

Aviation: Passenger Duty

Lord Mawhinney Excerpts
Wednesday 25th January 2012

(12 years, 3 months ago)

Lords Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
Lord De Mauley Portrait Lord De Mauley
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I have said that it is a tax. I am not prepared to go further than that.

Lord Mawhinney Portrait Lord Mawhinney
- Hansard - -

My Lords, given my noble friend’s answer to the noble Lord, Lord Morris, and that this duty will not come in until 2013, does that not give the Government the opportunity comprehensively to review the whole issue of this duty and perhaps to come up with a tax in its place which promotes UK growth, is less damaging to the competitiveness of UK carriers and is explained in a way that moves away from relying on an essential environmental message, which, frankly, few now believe, to some explanation for the tax that is more credible?

Lord De Mauley Portrait Lord De Mauley
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

My Lords, we have recently gone through a full consultation exercise on this. In answer to my noble friend’s question about the effect on the economy, the Government’s top priority remains to tackle the fiscal deficit. That means that these APD revenues must be maintained for the foreseeable future. The Government believe that the aviation sector should continue to make a fair contribution to the public finances.