Employment Law: Unfair Dismissal Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate

Lord Martin of Springburn

Main Page: Lord Martin of Springburn (Crossbench - Life peer)

Employment Law: Unfair Dismissal

Lord Martin of Springburn Excerpts
Thursday 24th November 2011

(12 years, 5 months ago)

Lords Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
Baroness Wilcox Portrait Baroness Wilcox
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

My noble friend of course has long experience in this House and I am delighted to hear him ask a question. It is worrying that small companies tell us that they are nervous about employing people. That should not be the case. We need jobs for our young people and for people who have been long-term unemployed. We need our new, coming companies to be confident to employ people. I have been an employer at a small company and a large company, and extending this period means that you have time to get used to each other and to learn the job. Very often people take more time than others to get used to that. We do not think a year is long enough and therefore we will be extending it to two.

Lord Martin of Springburn Portrait Lord Martin of Springburn
- Hansard - -

Drawing on my own industrial background, I put it to the noble Baroness that two years is far too long. We have come a long way from the days when a worker who had a complaint was told, “If you don’t like it, there’s the door”. We are in danger of going back to those days.

Baroness Wilcox Portrait Baroness Wilcox
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

Other rights, including “day one rights” such as the right not to be discriminated against, are unaffected and will continue to be so. We are trying to see whether this particular piece of work will get more people into employment and will work for smaller companies, which are nervous and which do not very often have big HR departments to help them. We need to get the trust back between the employer and the employee and I think that this will be a good way to do it.