NHS England: Major Incidents Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate

Lord MacKenzie of Culkein

Main Page: Lord MacKenzie of Culkein (Labour - Life peer)

NHS England: Major Incidents

Lord MacKenzie of Culkein Excerpts
Wednesday 28th January 2015

(9 years, 3 months ago)

Lords Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
Baroness Jolly Portrait Baroness Jolly
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I was not party to any of the conversations in the department at that time. However, the safety of patients is absolutely paramount. Although emergencies like this one were called, they lasted only for hours rather than for days and days and effectively they allowed the local trust, which was in difficulties, to call in staff and talk to surrounding trusts to ask for their support to deal with what was a fairly time-limited situation.

Lord MacKenzie of Culkein Portrait Lord MacKenzie of Culkein (Lab)
- Hansard - -

My Lords, will the Minister help the House: is it right that one of the matters to be considered is the possibility of reputational damage to the trust if it declares an emergency? That is nothing to do with clinical decision-making locally. Consulting the duty officer of NHS England before declaring an emergency is nothing to do with local clinical decision-making either. Perhaps the Minister can help the House.

Baroness Jolly Portrait Baroness Jolly
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

As I have said, patient safety and quality of care have to be absolutely paramount. Certainly, under the old system, if an NHS trust decided that it needed in effect to blow the whistle, I imagine that one would have informed somebody in the old strategic health authority that that was happening. I imagine that a trust would out of courtesy inform the person with whom they normally work in their local branch of NHS England.