Freedom of Speech: Hate Crime Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate

Lord Mackay of Clashfern

Main Page: Lord Mackay of Clashfern (Conservative - Life peer)

Freedom of Speech: Hate Crime

Lord Mackay of Clashfern Excerpts
Wednesday 6th December 2017

(6 years, 4 months ago)

Lords Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
Baroness Vere of Norbiton Portrait Baroness Vere of Norbiton
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I think all noble Lords know the background to where we are today. Twenty years ago this country had a very poor record of dealing with hate crime, and confidence in the criminal justice system among BAME communities was extremely low. We have come a long way. It is important to remember that the definition is used for flagging crimes; when it comes to charging those crimes, they still have to be done within the same legal framework as always.

Lord Mackay of Clashfern Portrait Lord Mackay of Clashfern (Con)
- Hansard - -

I do not think my noble friend has any authority to instruct the Director of Public Prosecutions in any way. However, she could write to ask the DPP whether she agrees with the statement in the Question that the definition is broader than what is in the statute and, only if so, to explain the authority on which that has been issued.

Baroness Vere of Norbiton Portrait Baroness Vere of Norbiton
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

My Lords, I will happily write to the director to ask those questions. I believe the response will be that it is broader but it is not used for charging; it is used purely for flagging those cases that may be a hate crime. That definition is a very important one.