European Union (Withdrawal) (No. 6) Bill Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate

Lord Lisvane

Main Page: Lord Lisvane (Crossbench - Life peer)

European Union (Withdrawal) (No. 6) Bill

Lord Lisvane Excerpts
Committee: 1st sitting (Hansard): House of Lords
Friday 6th September 2019

(4 years, 7 months ago)

Lords Chamber
Read Full debate European Union (Withdrawal) (No. 2) Act 2019 View all European Union (Withdrawal) (No. 2) Act 2019 Debates Read Hansard Text Amendment Paper: HL Bill 202-R-I Marshalled list for Report (PDF) - (6 Sep 2019)
Lord Kerr of Kinlochard Portrait Lord Kerr of Kinlochard
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

That is absolutely out of the question. The treaty language, including in Article 50, is absolutely clear that it is for the member state to proceed under its own constitutional procedures. That is specifically spelled out, including in Article 50. The idea that the European Union would interfere in our domestic decision-taking constitutional arrangements is out of the question.

Lord Lisvane Portrait Lord Lisvane (CB)
- Hansard - -

My Lords, on a slightly more pedantic level, I will try to assist the noble Viscount, Lord Trenchard, with his earlier question. I think he thought that Lords sitting days had not been statutorily defined. They are actually defined in Section 13(16)—

None Portrait Noble Lords
- Hansard -

Oh!

Lord Lisvane Portrait Lord Lisvane
- Hansard - -

I promised pedantry. They are defined in Section 13(16) of the European Union (Withdrawal) Act 2018.

Viscount Trenchard Portrait Viscount Trenchard
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I thank the noble Lord for his clarification, but that does not affect my basic premise that the Bill nevertheless refers to “Lords sitting days”, “days” and “calendar days” in a confusing manner. That also needs to be clarified.