Lord Lea of Crondall
Main Page: Lord Lea of Crondall (Non-affiliated - Life peer)Department Debates - View all Lord Lea of Crondall's debates with the Leader of the House
(14 years, 5 months ago)
Lords Chamber Lord Lea of Crondall
    
        
    
    
    
    
    
        
        
        
            Lord Lea of Crondall 
        
    
        
    
        
To ask Her Majesty’s Government whether they have taken into consideration issues such as members’ effectiveness and provision of facilities in increasing the size of the House to over 800.
 The Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster (Lord Strathclyde)
        
    
    
    
    
    
        
        
        
            The Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster (Lord Strathclyde) 
        
    
        
    
        The Government consider a range of issues before making appointments to the House of Lords.
 Lord Lea of Crondall
    
        
    
    
    
    
    
        
        
        
            Lord Lea of Crondall 
        
    
        
    
        I thank the noble Lord for that extremely helpful reply but, at a time of financial stringency, will the Government take responsibility for the escalation since the election of both the direct costs of Members and the costs of buildings, desks, telecoms, the Library, catering facilities and committee-servicing support staff, albeit that there are no more seats in the Chamber and no more speaking time in the Chamber? Secondly, we hear the Machiavellian argument that, whereas a constantly rising trend to 800 Members and above is unsustainable—that is correct—that is thereby one of the reasons for abolishing this House as we know it and replacing it with a second-class Commons. Is this not a crisis of the coalition’s own deliberate making and a tactic worthy of any self-respecting Bolshevik?
 Lord Strathclyde
        
    
    
    
    
    
        
        
        
            Lord Strathclyde 
        
    
        
    
        My Lords, that is a first for me. I do not know whether the noble Lord was rehearsing his speech for what will no doubt be an action-packed two-day debate on the future of your Lordships’ House in a few weeks’ time, but I do not recognise any of his characterisations. It is true that the House is bigger than it has been for some years. What is more significant is that the daily attendance has risen—though it is still below our full strength, at about 450 per day—and that has put some pressure on our facilities. However, various committees of the House look into this. The House should of course be comfortable and be able to provide for the needs of noble Lords, but these issues are simply not related to future reform.