Climate Change Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate

Lord Lawson of Blaby

Main Page: Lord Lawson of Blaby (Conservative - Life peer)
Tuesday 17th June 2014

(9 years, 11 months ago)

Lords Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
Baroness Verma Portrait Baroness Verma
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

The noble Lord is of course right that we need to have ambitious but cost-effective targets. We need the European Commission’s 2030 framework to be urgently agreed, which will adopt the 40% that the noble Lord mentioned. However, we have a more ambitious target to work towards—50%—in the context of an ambitious global agreement. That is what the United Kingdom is working hard to get.

Lord Lawson of Blaby Portrait Lord Lawson of Blaby (Con)
- Hansard - -

My Lords, is it not high time that the Government recognise that there is no point in damaging British industry and hurting the poor by setting an example which most of the rest of the world has not the slightest intention of emulating?

Baroness Verma Portrait Baroness Verma
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

My Lords, I am always grateful for my noble friend’s interventions. They are helpful because they allow me to raise a couple of serious issues. One of those is that unless all countries globally sign up to reducing carbon emissions, we will leave a bad place for future generations. Therefore, while I disagree with my noble friend’s premise about the intervention, it also challenges us to be able to respond in ways that allow competitiveness to grow while dealing with climate change issues.