Debates between Lord Lansley and Lord Moore of Etchingham during the 2024 Parliament

Arrangement of Business

Debate between Lord Lansley and Lord Moore of Etchingham
Friday 27th February 2026

(1 week, 1 day ago)

Lords Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
Lord Lansley Portrait Lord Lansley (Con)
- View Speech - Hansard - -

My Lords, I have listened to many hours of debate, but I have only spoken to one group so far. I have other amendments in one group later, which I think are very important, but they are 30 groups ahead. I have not taken a position for or against the Bill in principle. We should do our job, which is to make the Bill, as far as we can, fit for purpose and then return it to the other place. We are not going to achieve that unless we each take a personal responsibility to make that happen. For my part, I want to tell noble Lords that I will withdraw or not move my remaining amendments in Committee and consider very carefully which amendments are essential for Report. Otherwise, we cannot meet our obligations.

Lord Moore of Etchingham Portrait Lord Moore of Etchingham (Non-Afl)
- View Speech - Hansard - - - Excerpts

My Lords, I take the point made by the noble Lord, Lord Rooker, and other noble Lords about courtesy in relation to our proceedings. It would be helpful for those of us who are trying to amend the Bill to be told at the time when we are filibustering, because we do not think we are filibustering and we think we are debating the Bill. We would value some guidance if Peers on the other side were to jump up and say it at the time rather than in the papers or on the radio later.