Victims of the Troubles: Payment Scheme Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate

Lord Hain

Main Page: Lord Hain (Labour - Life peer)

Victims of the Troubles: Payment Scheme

Lord Hain Excerpts
Monday 8th June 2020

(3 years, 10 months ago)

Lords Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
Viscount Younger of Leckie Portrait Viscount Younger of Leckie [V]
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

My noble friend is right, and that is set down in the regulations. We know that Sinn Féin has said that it wants to look at redefining “victim”. However, it will know, and we know, that it is already set out in the legislation. Therefore we urge Sinn Féin to put aside its differences and move forward quickly on this matter.

Lord Hain Portrait Lord Hain (Lab) [V]
- Hansard - -

My Lords, since some Sinn Féin politicians either do not understand or are deliberately misrepresenting the victims payments scheme, will the Minister agree that the only category of people specifically excluded are those whose actions caused the incident in which others were severely injured? Surely only in a parallel universe could anybody seriously argue against that. The refusal of the First and Deputy First Ministers to agree on implementing the scheme, as they are legally obliged to do, is re-traumatising some of the most vulnerable victims and survivors just when, at long last, they thought justice was coming. Surely the only recourse now is for a severely injured victim and survivor to take the Executive Office to court for breaking the law under the 2019 Act?

Viscount Younger of Leckie Portrait Viscount Younger of Leckie [V]
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

The noble Lord is right to point out matters on the definition. Of course, it is up to the independent board—it will and must be formed as soon as a department has been designated for it—to take the definitions forward, and it will be up to it to decide the eligibility of those who apply for payments.