Paralympic Games 2016: Terrestrial Television Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate

Lord Grocott

Main Page: Lord Grocott (Labour - Life peer)

Paralympic Games 2016: Terrestrial Television

Lord Grocott Excerpts
Thursday 7th July 2016

(8 years, 4 months ago)

Lords Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
Earl of Courtown Portrait The Earl of Courtown
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

My Lords, I could not agree more with my noble friend. We had 500 hours of coverage in 2012 and in 2016, this year, we will have 600 hours of coverage. My noble friend also mentioned the effect that this had on the population. I can add that 74% of 12 to 16 year-olds said that they felt more comfortable discussing disability after those Games. My daughter was one of those—at the age of 12, she visited the 2012 Paralympics in London.

Lord Grocott Portrait Lord Grocott (Lab)
- Hansard - -

Does the Minister agree that terrestrial television was one of the reasons for the phenomenal national interest and excitement that was engendered by the successes of the Welsh football team—I am speaking as an Englishman—which was absolutely terrific? One of the key reasons was the fact that it was available free to air on terrestrial television and it was a great coming together of people’s interest and excitement. Does the Minister deeply regret, as I do, that so many of our national sporting events that were previously available on terrestrial television are now no longer available, and the country as a whole suffers in its enjoyment levels and even its sense of cohesion as a result of that loss?