Procedure of the House (Proposal 9) Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate

Lord Grenfell

Main Page: Lord Grenfell (Labour - Life peer)

Procedure of the House (Proposal 9)

Lord Grenfell Excerpts
Tuesday 8th November 2011

(12 years, 6 months ago)

Lords Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
None Portrait Noble Lords
- Hansard -

This side.

Lord Grenfell Portrait Lord Grenfell
- Hansard - -

My Lords, I am particularly happy at this moment to be able to agree with the noble Lord, Lord Pearson of Rannoch, for the first time in this century. I think he has got it right. If “honourable Member” is good enough for the other place, why can “noble Lord” not be good enough for this place? I do not mind whether eventually this becomes evolutionary progress towards a different system, but I do not think that we have to take the decision now that this change be made. Why chip away at the courtesies of the House—which we have been addressing for a long time this afternoon and saying how important they are—on this particular issue? It is unnecessary.

Lady Saltoun of Abernethy Portrait Lady Saltoun of Abernethy
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

My Lords, those of us who have been here quite a long time have all had to take the trouble to learn the antiquated modes of address and of referring to people. Why cannot people who have not been here for so long learn them too? Is it laziness? I do not see why we should change this. I also think that if you have to pause for a minute and think about how you refer to or address someone, it gives you a moment just to cool down in case you were thinking of being rather rude about them; rather like counting to 10 before you say anything. I do not think we should change this.