Phone Hacking Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate

Lord Fowler

Main Page: Lord Fowler (Crossbench - Life peer)

Phone Hacking

Lord Fowler Excerpts
Tuesday 15th November 2011

(13 years ago)

Lords Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
Lord Fowler Portrait Lord Fowler
- Hansard - -

My Lords, on phone hacking generally, has my noble friend noticed that there is now a campaign to deny the importance of the Leveson inquiry by some in the press who say that the matter should be left to the press to sort out for itself? Is it not the past failure of the press to take action that has led to this independent inquiry? Is its importance not further underlined by the mounting evidence that the phone hacking scandal extends beyond the News of the World to other papers?

Baroness Rawlings Portrait Baroness Rawlings
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

My Lords, my noble friend is very expert in these matters and has gone to the core of the subject. The failure of some of the press to abide by the law has been evident. Regarding the Leveson inquiry, we all recognise the importance for our democratic process of a free and effective press that acts with integrity. That is what we all want. However, at the same time, we have to acknowledge that certain parts of the press have not abided by the law or the self-regulatory code to which they voluntarily signed up. As my noble friend says, it is the failures that the Leveson inquiry will seek to address.