Covid-19: Great Barrington Declaration Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate
Department: Department of Health and Social Care

Covid-19: Great Barrington Declaration

Lord Faulkner of Worcester Excerpts
Tuesday 13th October 2020

(3 years, 9 months ago)

Lords Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Lord Fowler Portrait The Lord Speaker (Lord Fowler)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I call the noble Lord, Lord Faulkner, who I forgot to call before.

Lord Faulkner of Worcester Portrait Lord Faulkner of Worcester (Lab) [V]
- Hansard - -

My Lords, is the Minister aware that this so-called declaration is principally the work of the American Institute for Economic Research, a libertarian think tank funded by the Koch foundation and best known for its denial of climate change? As the Minister said in an earlier answer, a large number of the signatories are completely bogus. Does he agree that we should have nothing to do with fake science, which provides cover for a cull of the elderly and the disabled under the guise of herd immunity and promotes an American far-right agenda?

Lord Bethell Portrait Lord Bethell (Con)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

My Lords, there is some shared interest with those who drafted the Great Barrington declaration. They quite rightly make observations about the impact of the pandemic on education, and we are providing £1 billion to support those whose education has been hit by Covid. They make observations about support for those who are shielding, and we have written a new letter to 2.2 million people who are undergoing shielding. However, the noble Lord is entirely right: this is Johnny Bananas science, and we will not support it.