Brexit: Article 50 Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate
Department: Leader of the House

Brexit: Article 50

Lord Elystan-Morgan Excerpts
Wednesday 2nd November 2016

(7 years, 6 months ago)

Lords Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Baroness Goldie Portrait Baroness Goldie
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

Not for the first time my noble friend has made a very eloquent and pithy point upon which I cannot improve.

Lord Elystan-Morgan Portrait Lord Elystan-Morgan (CB)
- Hansard - -

My Lords, can the noble Baroness cite to the House an instance of the exercise of the royal prerogative over the past 50 years in any grave and weighty context? Is it the case that the Government do not regard this issue as being grave and weighty, or is it a possibility that there is a flicker of doubt as to whether they might or might not be able to carry the matter in both Houses of Parliament?

Baroness Goldie Portrait Baroness Goldie
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

Let me try to cut to the chase for the benefit of the noble Lord. What happened as a result of the EU referendum was that the people of the United Kingdom delivered an instruction, and that instruction was to leave the EU. Quite simply, the first part of the process, the necessary key that needs to be put into the ignition to start that journey, is triggering Article 50. That is what the Government propose to do.